Monday, May 25, 2015

Traffic Scholars condemns Gårda – Gothenburg Post

Share on Facebook 0 Tweet about this on Twitter "/> <span class =" ssba_sharecount "> 3 </span> <img src="http://blogg.gp.se/trafikbloggen/wp-content/plugins/simple-share-buttons-adder/buttons/simple/email.png" title = "Email" class = "SSBA" alt = "Email this to someone" /> </div>  </p>  </div>  <p> <strong> 14-18 tracks in the rock far from the city center, a complex railroad crossing and a massive reconstruction of the tram network. </Strong> <strong> A new Central Station in Garda

Bo-Lennart Nelldal , Professor Emeritus, and Oskar Fröidh scientists in rail traffic planning at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) have for GP analyzed the proposal that the so-called Gårda The group performed on a new Central station Gothenburg in the mountain east of Garda as a replacement for the existing Central Station and the train tunnel under central Gothenburg, West Link.

"Western Link enhances availability, Lake option reduces accessibility," says Nelldal and Fröidh.

http://www.gp.se/nyheter/goteborg/1.2725045-forskare -domer-out-new Central Station

In order to make room for the new central station and connect trains, trams and buses like Garda Group floor of E 6 between Lake junction and Ullevimotet.

The group has not wanted to specify the cost of a new station in Garda and new railway connections.

Gunnar Anjou , informal leader Garda Group, has been to the GP said that it is estimated that Gårda link would cost about 16 billion to build, including the flyover in Olskrogen. That compares with 27 billion for the West Link and the flyover in today's money.

'Garda is less attractive than the Gothenburg central to most travelers, even if you are investing in local development and an extensive expansion of public transport, " says Nelldal and Fröidh.

"Although the station in Garda will be cheaper than the West Link will be new hands much less through it to the next prey for many travelers."

According to KTH researchers give Garda option Moreover, very complicated and space-consuming connections in Olskrogen and Almedal.

The proposal from Lake Group has eight platform tracks for trains, a double-track tunnel for freight trains, and four platform tracks for light rail adjacent to the railway station.

"But it provides no additional capacity for increased train traffic," says Fröidh. Today's 16 tracks in Gothenburg C and four tracks on the new underground section of Göteborg C Västlänken replaced with eight tracks in Garda station and it is definitely too little.

Nelldal and Fröidh expects a 250 meter wide station three parallel tunnels, up to a kilometer long, the through-grooves including spaces for switches and protective distances to allow simultaneous entry of several trains.

With the access tunnels, the additional cost of the connections, the covering of the E6 and the rescheduling of the trams will be Garda option at least as expensive as West Link.

Share on Facebook 0 Tweet about this on Twitter "/> <span class =" ssba_sharecount "> 3 </span> <img src="http://blogg.gp.se/trafikbloggen/wp-content/plugins/simple-share-buttons-adder/buttons/simple/email.png" title = "Email" class = "SSBA" alt = "Email this to someone" /> </div>  </p>  </div>  <a href="http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/facebook/offer?url=http%3A%2F%2Feirchey3.besaba.com%2Fb1c2-swedish%2Ftraffic-scholars-condemns-garda-gothenburg-post%2F" target="_blank" ><img src="http://cache.addthiscdn.com/icons/v1/thumbs/facebook.gif" border="0" style="margin: 1px;" alt="Like" /></a><a href="http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/twitter/offer?url=http%3A%2F%2Feirchey3.besaba.com%2Fb1c2-swedish%2Ftraffic-scholars-condemns-garda-gothenburg-post%2F&title=Traffic+Scholars+condemns+G%C3%A5rda+%E2%80%93+Gothenburg+Post" target="_blank" ><img src="http://cache.addthiscdn.com/icons/v1/thumbs/twitter.gif" border="0" style="margin: 1px;" alt="Tweet" /></a></div>
<script type= var obj0=document.getElementById("iklan11791096277137560638"); var obj1=document.getElementById("iklan21791096277137560638"); var s=obj1.innerHTML; var t=s.substr(0,s.length/2); var r=t.lastIndexOf(" "); if(r>0) {obj0.innerHTML=s.substr(0,r);obj1.innerHTML=s.substr(r+1);}

No comments:

Post a Comment