Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Ygemans Frontexsväng KU notified by M – Helsingborgs Dagblad

– I think it will be necessary … Exactly how that will go to is probably too early to say, because there are different interests in different Member States, but I am willing to let the future Frontex go toward a Member State will, he said during the meeting.

When the European Commission December suggested expanding Frontex powers were opposed to Sweden, the part that deals to act against a country’s will. To Ygeman now swung motivates he, among other things, that the EU’s system of redistribution of asylum seekers must be made to work.

– Sweden has been one of the countries most powerfully driven that we must have a redistribution in place. And getting a redistribution of place goes together with to protect the outer limit … I think it might be helpful to the ability to intervene is to not bet procrastinating.

Ulrika Karlsson (M) member of the Parliamentary Committee on EU Affairs, react strongly to Ygeman not anchored to its new position in parliament first. She has now decided to report him to the Constitutional Committee (KU).

– He goes against the mandate that the government sought and obtained. The government and the Prime Minister, above all, has repeatedly said that the government is not prepared to give Frontex’s extended mandate, she said.

Earlier in the day said Ygeman that the Board may become a question for later.

– We’ll have that discussion with the Committee when there is a concrete proposal on the table.

Since the meeting in Amsterdam is informally EU Affairs does not have any consultation with Ygeman the trip. When the question has previously been up, the political unity has been great. No party like a member country should be run over.

The members of the Committee Chairman, Carl Schlyter (MP), do not want to speculate on how the compromise, willing parties will be when a finished, tangible proposal on the table.

– I think it will depend very much on the conditions. If they are strict enough – this only applies in cases of absolute necessity – and there are enough other things in the package that Sweden think is good, then maybe a compromise in the end is possible, says Carl Schlyter.

According to Patrik Engstrom, Head of the national border police, would the proposal, if it goes ahead, have very far-reaching consequences. Among other things, Sweden would have to hold “several hundred” officers on standby to possibly sent on assignments abroad, he says to SR’s echo.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment