Updated today 14:30.
Published today 13:39
Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt bows out on election night.
The Conservatives failed miserably to attract voters from LO collective, especially women. The figures show that the party is already developed. Now start the election analysis group under management of member of parliament Hans Wallmark the work that will form the basis for the next election campaign.
The Conservatives failed miserably to attract voters from LO collective, especially women. The figures show that the party is already developed. Now start the election analysis group under management of member of parliament Hans Wallmark the work that will form the basis for the next election campaign.
Hans Wallmark and the party’s opinion-chief Per Nilsson today presented some preliminary findings from this year’s election. Nilsson points already on a select group where Moderates went up in 2010 but now lost big.
- We have not ruckat LO at any percentage at all. It was where we went up in the 2010 election The large group is public employees LO women belonging LO collective and where we reach distressingly low levels. There we have a key group to win the 2018 election, it is our great task, says Per Nilsson.
Ad:
Hans Wallmark would not say anything yet about how this will succeed.
- It’s a little too early to go into it, we are in a collection mode. However, any conclusions we must draw and make recommendations for the future, says Wallmark who want the group’s work will be the basis for additional congress in March next year when a new M-leaders will be elected.
SVT exit poll shows that the Sweden Democrats took most voters from the Moderate Party, compared with the last election. Opinion manager Per Nilsson would, however, like to nuance the picture.
- Among those who voted for us in 2010, many people do not see themselves as moderates. Many voted for S. They move in the landscape between the S, M and SD. They are highly mobile and in the SD group is an alternative, says Nilsson.
He buys nor explanation to a failed integration policy would have pushed voters into the arms of SD.
- There has always been a group of Swedes who wanted to limit immigration. They have not had a party before the SD arrived. Jimmie Akesson is a political entrepreneur who has built a lot in the long term that satisfies this opinion. A lot of these voters vote on the SD simply because they want to limit immigration. There is nothing that we can do something about. We stand for transparency, says Nilsson.
Hans Wallmark has another reconnaissance that he brings into the work valanalysen.
- My conclusion is that people who were relatively satisfied with the economic policies still wanted to highlight the alliance that “these areas have you forgotten”. The defense is one such, immigration and refugee issue another, health care, seniors, gender, environment and climate. This election was all about sending signals, says Wallmark.
The two Conservatives believe that the party had a strong electoral campaign based on a really bad position in public opinion. There was according to Per Nilsson a widespread feeling that “something was broken” by S fueled his rhetoric. The disappointing results of the PISA test seemed to confirm this and reinforced the left wind.
Opportunities to address this was limited by the economy did not allow any big campaign promises and that the alliance after eight years in power had difficulty launching major reforms. The distance to the red-green still fell wants Nilsson and Wallmark including explaining with Fredrik Reinfeldt and C-leader Annie Lööf efforts in the campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment