Löfvens answer – after Åkessons new requirements – Expressen

“It’s going good for Sweden. So keep you you to this the prime minister”, replied Stefan Löfven on Jimmie Åkessons strong words that he will do everything to remove the Leaves from the highest post.

But it was not an appeal to the SD controller in view of a possible future statsministeromröstning.

“No,” says Stefan Löfven.

It was at times hard tag during Wednesday’s partiledardebatt in the parliament. Jimmie Åkesson (SD), noted that Stefan Löfven failed at everything and that he needs to be removed as prime minister.

“We want to remove him, we want a different government, and it is of the highest priority,” says Jimmie Åkesson when he after the debate explained his statement to Expressen.

It was a powerful word when you talked about that you would have removed Stefan Löfven as prime minister, you would do everything to see to it that it is becoming so, what was behind the kraftansamlingen?

” We have given the bourgeoisie in parliament, I think, eight chances during this term so far, to vote to remove Stefan Löfven and dismiss this government. You have not taken the chances, therefore, it becomes important for me to emphasise it, ” says Jimmie Åkesson.

In the debate asked the prime minister Åkesson against the wall and thought that the sweden democrats ‘ leader did not understand what it was for the cuts he voted for through the support of the Conservatives policies.

But this, too, that you have chosen to go on the Conservatives line should, according to Jimmie Åkesson is seen as a way to get off the prime minister.

We have assessed the Conservatives policies as less harmful but it is also, above all, a way to select against Stefan Löfven.

the Prime minister reacted to the strong words in the house by to invite Jimmie Åkesson not be so quick to call for a new prime minister, but “keep to”.

After the debate explained Löfven’s statement.

– He claimed that we only have luck. We’ve now had eight years with borglig government where the unemployment rate rose in height, the youth unemployment rate and long term unemployment. Now it goes right with our government, then to talk about “luck”.

” But it is better to have someone who have good luck than bad luck.

Not so that you appealed to Åkesson for a future statsministeromröstning?

– No.

” I think we clarified the differences in american politics just as they are with this debate. We have a borglig opposition that wants to return to its old policies that created high unemployment, and it is no good.