Saturday, April 30, 2016

Stefan Löfvens new notice of Romson – Expressen

Stefan Löfvens new blow to MP spokesperson Åsa Romson:

She was not suitable as a substitute.

Her title as Deputy Prime Minister, apply only in the “representative contexts”.

– I have chosen not to appoint a deputy. The title I have used to Åsa Romson to have representative data, says Prime Minister during questioning of the Parliamentary Constitutional Committee, KU.

Åsa Romson’s Deputy Prime Minister, yet not. So, the answers from the Prime Minister Stefan Löfven in KU today summarized.

When Stefan Löfven appointed ministers in his government received MP mouthpiece title of “Deputy Prime Minister”. But that does not mean that it is she who is the replacement when he is vacant or unable to fulfill their duties.

It does rather Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom, the minister who was minister at the time.

– the Prime Minister, according to the Government to appoint a representative who will perform hens data. But there is no obligation to appoint a deputy. I have chosen not to do that, said Stefan Löfven.

– I have appointed a deputy prime minister for a representantiv role. That is how it is completed.



Löfven: “The title has a different meaning”

According to the Prime Minister has Romsons title “given us advantages”.

Löfven mentions another Åsa Romson visit to China, where she was due title got to meet Chinese Vice Premier. He also mentions a farewell lunch with the President of India, when he visited Sweden.

– then know that this title has different meanings in different countries.

According Löfven has Romson due the title also received prolonged speaking during a visit to Peru.

the Moderates MP Marta Obminska pressed during KU hearings today Stefan Löfven when asked why he had not been clear that Romson not representative.

– All decisions I have taken notified the Parliament. Had I made the decision to Åsa Romson to be representative, it had emerged, he says.



“Have acted constitutionally entitled”

Stefan Löfven admitted simultaneously:

– Certainly, the information could have been clearer, but formally I mean that I acted constitutionally correct.

liberals MP Mathias Sundin stated during KU interrogations that were previously so that anyone who has been Deputy Prime Minister also been deputy.

– Why there was no reason to inform the Swedish people about this new order? asked Sundin.

– Formally fulfill my duty to provide information when I submit the decisions to parliament, said Löfven, and noted that the President was informed in October 2014.

Asked why Stefan Löfven not appointed Åsa Romson to deputy Prime Minister responded:

– It is up to the Prime Minister to decide. Anyone who has been a minister at the time it is required to be, and I think this is a proper order.



was asked if the King informed

The Christian Democrats MP Tuve Skånberg noted that the government Löfvens decisions “an absolutely unique relationship” that neither party leader circuit, Security Service or the war delegation informed.

– is it really responsible? Skånberg asked, and the Prime Minister responded:

– I have informed and used the space of Government prescribes. I have chosen not to inform about the decisions I have made.

Stefan Löfven was also asked about the King informed.

– Exactly when the information was …? We regularly provide information to the court at the government’s formation. Then I assume that it also emerged, said the Prime Minister.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment