The mother’s grief during the trial – the Express newspaper

the city of NORRKÖPING. Friday began the trial after the vargattacken where a 30-year-old animal keeper was killed.

Several of the prosecutor’s evidence is the footage from before the time of the accident.

When the dead daughter’s voice could be heard out in the hall, no longer could the mother keep the tears away.

Now get a vargangrepp at a zoo for the first time, their legal aftermath. A large part of the evidence in the proceedings is a clip from the visitors who become guided inside of the wolves before the accident. In hall 1 at the Norrköping district court forced the family of the dead woman to see movies on the wolves which, according to the obduktionsrapporten killed her.

” It was a regntung day, June 17, 2012, began prosecutor Linda Schön his description of the day of the accident for nearly four years ago.

– In the background we will hear JJ’s voice, warns Linda Schön.

When her voice echoed out in the hall, it becomes too much for the mother, and she slaps his face in his hands.

Now get a vargangrepp at a zoo for the first time, their legal aftermath.Photo: Police

the Wolf was not on the list

a Little later, to either the mother or sister of the injured woman watch the large video screens. But the sound from the sometimes very aggressive wolves. We get to see how one of the vargguiderna attacked by a ledarvarg and she must kick herself free.

” But on the list of dangerous animals at Kolmården zoo, so there was not the wolf, noted prosecutor Linda Schön.

It was the prosecutor’s day in court, and a large part of the case stated was all about risk management at the Kolmården zoo. For it is the working environment that is in focus.

Prosecutors made the assessment that if the Kolmården zoo had fulfilled its arbetsmiljöskyddsarbete – so had the accident been avoided.

it had not happened, ” says Jan Olof Andersson, actor at riksenheten for environmental and work environment objectives.

Linda Schön read up on it as the zoo wrote in their arbetsmiljödokument before the fatal accident.

– Here, it is also empty. You have created different headings to fill in the things simply, but we have not come further, ” she says.

It was the prosecutor’s day in court, and a large part of the case stated was all about risk management at the Kolmården zoo.Photo: Roger Vikström

Zoo denies breach

And there was a lot of repetition, something that was totally intentional. Several times before the accident happened had the Swedish work environment authority have been in contact with the zoo and claimed that they would address a number of points, including reträttvägar and lack of tillbudsrutiner in the park.

during the trial were the defendants Mats Höggren, zoological director at the time of the accident, and the lawyer representing the Kolmården zoo AB Both announced Friday that they still deny the crime.

“It is a tragic event that no one should be punished for,” said Mats Höggrens lawyer Johan Eriksson and continues:

today it is the prosecutor’s day, but we want to give a more nuanced picture of the work with the wolves at Kolmården zoo.

Djurvårdarens family has declined to comment on the incident. On Tuesday, the trial.