Policy. ruling coalition parties had agreed promises a common reform agenda for the next election.
But today, there are large differences in their job – and tax policy.
ruling coalition parties had agreed claims, nevertheless, that you have a common way forward for Sweden, with a focus on stable central government finances, more jobs, better integration, more education, and to safeguard the welfare kernel: health care, school and care.
– At the base, we build a little bit of different blocks, say the Conservatives ekonomiskpolitiske spokesperson Ulf Kristersson.
lower taxes
But judging by the parties budgetmotioner takes a lot of work to bring a common election manifesto. Their proposals differ in important areas. They want to, for example, reducing the tax on work, but in completely different ways.
M wants to put nine billion reduction in income tax to make it more profitable to work mainly for those with lower incomes. The liberals want to lower the state income tax by 16 billion, of which the latest war for high-income earners costs seven billion.
– We think that the high tax on low incomes is a bigger problem than high taxes on high incomes, ” says Ulf Kristersson.
the Christian democrats want to impose an earned income tax credit for parents who in 2018 will cost twelve billion. Also the Centre party wants to lower the income tax, but would particularly like to add twelve billion lifting of the employer’s contribution for those who are getting their first job.
Different models
– We are now testing different models, but when we sit down and examine the details in different models, so we will certainly find the pieces that fit into each other, says Kristersson.
Even when it comes more resources for health care, schools and care goes parties budgetmotioner apart. C says yes to the government’s “välfärdsmiljarder” to the municipalities and plussar in addition, an additional billion. Also M wants to raise the discretionary government grants to municipalities, but also make directional bets on the school. L and KD do not want to raise the general local government grants without targeted money specifically to the school and the care.
Key issues
in Addition, disagreement on a number of matters of the heart. The liberals want to, for example, give a billion dollars more to assistansersättningen and increase defence spending. KD will return with a new twist on the old parental allowance and want to cut taxes for pensioners. C to reset the root deduction, which costs the state over six billion.
ruling coalition parties had agreed agree to not lend to their proposal, so that the public finances are in balance next year. All say no to the government’s byggstöd, they want to clear the labour market measures and make savings in unemployment and health insurance. The conservatives would, however, go the farthest when it comes to tighten subsidies and allowances. In addition, see M greater savings in the front than the other.
the FACTS
Issues that divide
within a month: M, want to introduce an earned income tax credit to first job-the deduction with a focus on those with low wages. L want to lower state taxes, for example, removing the värnskatten. (C) to reduce the employer’s contributions. KD wants to introduce an earned income tax credit for parents.
Kommunmiljarderna: L and KD says no to an increase in general government grants. C wants to raise them more than the government. M want to have a mix of increases in general government grants and targeted.
Different emphases: L want to bet more on defense and raise the assistansersättningen. KD wants to re-introduce paid parental leave in new shape and lower the pensionärsskatten. C wants to reintroduce the rot deduction. M cut more into the benefits system and want to save somewhat more on the migration.
TT
No comments:
Post a Comment