While says the Liberal party to the political situation of the day, with a big racist party in the parliament, means that the ingrained reasoning of the policy of blocs, no longer holds. He is completely right, but there are still pundits and politicians on the allianssidan do not want to understand what the new situation means.
of course, It was a coincidence that the DN’s interview with Björklund came the day after one of the leading sweden democrats openly expressed anti-semitic beliefs (jews control the press). But it was a coincidence that makes the meaning of his reasoning even more clearly.
me it is inconceivable that the rule with the active support of the SD, says Bjorklund. He also notes that the man must reckon with the fact that the SD in active cooperation with one another will require more and more concessions and to constantly threaten to trigger a new election.
Bjorklund believes that the country needs an action-oriented government that can gain a majority in parliament for their own policies. At the same time, he believes that there is an accident that the Left party in the position that now prevails can exert influence on government policy. How great this influence is in reality is can be debated, but it is clear that from an overall liberal or alliansperspektiv is better if V is held at a greater distance than in the day.
björklund’s preferred option is a alliansregering that can reign without making itself dependent upon the SD. But if the current parliamentary position is about the next elections, so lapses in the practice of this opportunity. Would you also then avoid a rödgrön government with the influence of the Left party it is thus necessary for any form of cooperation over the blockgränsen be done.
the red-green larger than the ruling coalition parties had agreed and so, therefore, a broader coalition is formed, where S and the whole alliance to participate. Such a government would have a safe majority in the parliament, something that probably also would apply to a government consisting of only S and M – something Björklund believes that the alliance in general in this case should drop.
the Idea of a smaller coalition S, the Liberals and the Centre party, rejects however. Such a government will probably not be strong enough and risk again and again to lose important votes. What would be possible if the L and C becomes stronger than in the day is possibly a different issue.
Will the alliance hold together as regeringsalternativ so must M and KD provide clear information on that nor they can think of to rule with the active support of the sweden democrats. The centre party has the same attitude as the Liberals. Anna Kinberg Batra and Ebba Busch Thor can no longer repress what the new political map actually mean. And they should both realize that a alliansregering who are forced to take the active support of the SD is not politically credible.
Håkan Holmberg
No comments:
Post a Comment