In the spring changed the Greens one of her mouthpieces. Åsa Romson were considered to have the major responsibility for the crisis that the party ended up in, and Isabella had to take over. The hope was that she would reverse the downward trend.
today it was partiledardebatt in the parliament, and the green Party was represented for the first time, by Isabella Lövin. It was not a strong debut, on the contrary. She read the most read and talked about their responsibilities in the government: the relief and climate change. Despite this, she had difficulty in the debate, and had, for example, very difficult to cope with the environmental debate with the Centre party, Annie Lööf.
As a member of the EU parliament, and the minister has Isabella been able to be narrow in its political know-how. It is not good enough the mouthpiece. Yesterday’s partiledardebatt showed that Isabella does not have broadened their political records when she became the mouthpiece. It was not in yesterday’s partiledardebatt, and it will not hold in the future. If Isabella did not manage to learn the whole of the Green party policies, she will never help to solve the party’s problems.
In general partiledardebatten pretty off. It was not nearly as lively and interesting as when party leaders clashed in the Swedish Television last Sunday. Stefan Löfven, for example, was more careful, and called not The sweden democrats for the nazi party a single time.
The one who was clearly the best in the debate was Annie Lööf. She has really evolved as a commentator the last few years, and was rapp and skilled in his lines. The best was she in his replikskifte with the social Democrats ‘Stefan Löfven about the perception on the cooperation with The sweden democrats, where she pointed out that Stefan Löfven earlier in the debate had tried to persuade the sweden democrats’ Jimmie Åkesson to support the government’s proposals on the new procurement law: “Stefan Löfven tried for an hour then free to Jimmie Åkesson. I would never do it”. This made Stefan Löfven was dumbfounded.
However, Stefan Löfven oemotsagd continue rumours about alliansregeringens policy. According to Stefan Löfven discontinued the alliance government, the Swedish model, just thought of lowered taxes, and brought a policy that led to higher unemployment. According to Stefan Löfven develop the P-MP-the government, the Swedish model, investing on community building rather than for the tax cut, has created 120000 jobs after the elections and has turned budget deficits into surpluses.
In the socialist propaganda, it has never found any financial crisis. In reality, it was the tax cuts which kept its momentum in the Swedish economy during the financial crisis and the unemployment rate here increased much less than in most other EU-countries. It meant the deficit in the state budget, but such deficits are normal in a recession.
Right now it is booming. Then increase employment. When should the state budget surplus. So it is not in the day.
the social democrats are adept to create myths about what happened under conservative governments. That is exactly what Stefan Löfven is now. The alliance leader must be quick to dispel the myth so that it is not taken for the truth. They did not, unfortunately, in today’s partiledardebatt.
► well, You have our app? Download free to your iPhone or Android .
No comments:
Post a Comment