– We are no change in the duration of sick leave in connection with the costs of the employer increases, says Daniel Hallberg, the evaluation manager at the ISF.
He points out that the effects have been difficult to assess and that the results should be interpreted cautiously.
– The reform was introduced during a period when there was a decreasing absenteeism in general and there were also other reforms at the same time that may have affected, says Daniel Hallberg.
The results also show that more sick leave received rehabilitation in connection with the reform, and fewer who were sick on the part went on to be on sick leave on full time.
– It is in line with what we wanted to achieve reform, says Daniel Hallberg.
that employers do not fully knew of reform, and that it lasted for a short time, may also explain the greater impact came.
– The part the adaptation that proves the longer term have not been able to be studied, for example, that the employer is intensifying efforts to prevent sick leave, says Daniel Hallberg.
No comments:
Post a Comment